Evidence is scattered
Support materials are spread across uploads, screenshots, forms, and messages.
Evidence-backed approvals for self-hosted wallet payouts and redemptions.
CryptoScope helps compliance and operations teams review self-hosted wallet payouts and redemptions without scattered evidence, inconsistent approvals, or a thin decision record.
Built for compliance, operations, and reviewer teams inside regulated crypto, on/off-ramp, and payments environments handling stablecoin or EMT-linked payout and redemption decisions.
Built by CryptoScope BV, a Belgium-based bootstrapped software startup founded by Hasan Özer.
How teams handle this today
Ownership evidence lives in uploads, forms, screenshots, and inbox threads. Approvals move through tickets, email, and spreadsheets. Reviewer standards vary by person and by case, and the final decision record is often too thin to defend later.
Approvals are inconsistent
Ticket, email, and spreadsheet handoffs make standards drift across reviewers.
Exceptions are hard to defend
When a case is escalated, the review trail is often incomplete or hard to reconstruct.
The outcome record is weak
Teams can approve the case, but still lack a clear paper trail for why.
CryptoScope turns that fragmented reviewer process into one structured workflow and one defensible decision record.
One workflow from intake to defensible decision record.
CryptoScope organizes each case into a repeatable sequence for compliance and operations teams.
Intake
Capture payout or redemption context and case metadata in one place.
Evidence
Collect ownership and supporting evidence against a consistent checklist.
Policy Checks
Apply policy checkpoints and flag required reviewer attention areas.
Reviewer Decision
Route approvals with reviewer rationale and escalation support.
Decision Record
Generate a complete, defensible outcome record for internal and external review.
The record reviewers leave behind.
What the reviewer leaves behind is the product payoff: a record that shows what was reviewed, what was checked, who approved it, and why the decision was made.
What the final decision record includes
- Case identifiers and reviewed payout or redemption context
- Ownership evidence summary and supporting materials
- Policy checks triggered during the review
- Reviewer rationale and approval path
- Final decision with timestamps and audit readiness
Sample reviewer output
One artifact, not a scattered trail.
ContextSelf-hosted redemption review
EvidenceOwnership documents + supporting files
ChecksPolicy checkpoints triggered
OutcomeApproved with reviewer rationale
Built for compliance, operations, and reviewer teams.
Regulated crypto teams
Compliance and reviewer teams inside exchanges and on/off-ramp providers.
Payments operations
Operations teams handling stablecoin or EMT-linked payout and redemption flows.
Crypto-enabled PSPs
Teams routing self-hosted wallet decisions through repeatable review steps.
Risk and control teams
Maintain defensible evidence for oversight, exception handling, and sign-off.
Why now
Stablecoin and EMT-linked payout volumes are scaling.
Self-hosted wallet routing increases evidence and approval workload.
Reviewer teams need repeatable, defensible decisions under tighter controls.
Product-led evaluation
Teams evaluate CryptoScope through focused product demos and pilot workflows built around real reviewer processes.
See the workflow end-to-end
See the exact flow teams use to move from intake to final decision record.
What CryptoScope is not
CryptoScope is not a monitoring tool, blockchain analytics platform, exchange, or custodian. It sits at the reviewer step after a payout or redemption reaches manual review.
Company and trust details
CompanyCryptoScope BV
FounderHasan Özer
Registered legal addressJozef Kenneslei 2, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
CountryBelgium
Funding stageBootstrapped
Support and incubationHubs4Growth (2025–2026) at The Beacon
Contact emailhasan@cryptoscope.app